South Africa has once again failed to co-sponsor a United Nations resolution on Holocaust remembrance. Last month the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), at the annual general conference, passed a historic resolution calling on the organization to help combat Holocaust denial. Although the resolution was passed unanimously by consensus, 65 countries (including 4 African states) chose to show their explicit support by co-sponsoring.
Why is it that countries like Oman, who do not even recognize the existence of the State of Israel, can sponsor the resolution and not South Africa? What excuse will Pretoria try peddle this time? On the last 2 occasions, the government claimed it was an administrative oversight and regretted the mistake. Well this is now strike number 3 and pathetic excuses just are not going to cut it.
The South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD) after their last meeting with the Department of Foreign Affairs assured us that a new understanding had been reached. The politics of influence they promised would ensure that this sort of thing does not happen again. This vote is just a further indication of the bankruptcy of their strategy.
It is interesting to contrast South Africa’s continued refusal to support Holocaust resolutions in international arenas with its dramatic policy change on Burma. Last month, the government finally agreed to allow the military Junta’s brutality to be discussed at the UN Security Council. It had previously claimed that the issue did not represent a threat to international peace and security and thus was not relevant for that forum. So what made the difference? The public outcry over its original Burma vote! If the Jewish community had mobilized the same public anger over the Holocaust issue, it is very likely that there would have been a similar change in the government’s behavior. But we did not. We chose rather to whisper softly softly our displeasure and accept lame excuses.
Teddy Roosevelt used to describe the secret to diplomacy as ‘speak softly and carry a big stick’. The key of course is the big stick. For without it, speaking softly just results in no-one hearing!
Countries co-sponsoring the resolution
The Commission recommends that the General Conference adopt in extenso with a view to its inclusion in the Records of the General Conference, Volume I (Resolutions), the draft resolution contained in paragraph 6 of the Annex of document 34 C/49 submitted by Australia, Canada, Israel, Russian Federation and the United States of America and co-sponsored by Albania, Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Benin, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, 34 C/78 – page 9 Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Republic of Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Panama, Paraguay, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Ukraine and Uruguay, as amended by the Commission. |
What an embarrassment.
Posted by: Joel Pollak | November 05, 2007 at 10:11
Surprised?
I have come to excpect South Africa to always side with evil and take an immoral stance at the UN and internationally.
The day SA actually does something moral and right in foreign policy I will be astounded!
Posted by: | November 05, 2007 at 10:26
Mike,
South Africa doesn't need to peddle any excuses. It is obligated by the
various agreements negotiated by Ronno Einstein on his last trip to
Tehran. His Iranian buddies are holocaust deniers and as a result it
would be "immoral" for South Africa to have anything to do with a UN
resolution that recognizes
the holocaust.
I would hope that The UK, inter alia, now wakes up to the fact that
South Africa should not be a permanent member of the security council.
When I was last in The UK, I heard David Milliband (foreign secretary)
saying that his govt supported a South African seat on the security
council. Clearly, Pretoria revels in being part of "the axis of evil'
and it is about time that Milliband realized it.
Posted by: THE BLACKLISTED DICTATOR | November 05, 2007 at 19:00
Welcome back Anthony. Its been a while. The West seems blind to South Africa.
Posted by: Mike | November 05, 2007 at 23:19
It's true Mike.
Funny thing that when SA is so blatant and loud about their support for the AXis of Evil.
It seems if they are openly defying the WEst but get away scott free every time.
Posted by: Gary | November 06, 2007 at 10:17