Advertising

  • Advertise here

Blog Awards


  • Sablogpolitics

  • Sablogpolitics

  • Sablogrunnerupgroup

  • Sablogrunneruppost

  • JIB

Miscellaneous

« Can Abbas Control His Thugs? | Main | SA in New Nuke Talks with Iran »

November 07, 2005

Comments

David Gerstman

You assume that Arafat would change. But that misunderstands him.
But it also mis-reads the situation. If the shock of an assassinated Prime Minister didn't change Arafat (and everyone else) why would an almost miss have a more significant effect. Arafat was just as committed to Israel's destruction (and his own power) while Rabin was alive as he was after.
I don't buy this scenario at all.

mike

It was meant to be sarcastic. I agree with you Arafat wouldn’t have changed. Just like the U.S. signing the Kyoto Protocol wouldn’t have made Osama Bin Laden give up his Jihad. I think Clinton and Arafat's contentions are ridiculous. Was trying to make a mockery of them. I think in the future i will stay away from humour.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search this Blog


Contact Us


  • Email_1

Events & Lectures

  • Advertise your event or lecture here

News Feed



Comments Disclaimer

  • Comments on this site are the views and opinions of the persons who write the comments and do not reflect the views of the authors of this blog. Comments are often left unmoderated. Should you feel that you have been personally slandered in the comments, please let us know and we will remove the offensive comment.