• Advertise here

Blog Awards

  • Sablogpolitics

  • Sablogpolitics

  • Sablogrunnerupgroup

  • Sablogrunneruppost

  • JIB


« Filthy Ghouls Dont Want Israel to Leave Gaza | Main | Steinfeld on the Single State Solution »

May 08, 2005



She looks balanced, fair, and


She thinks Israel were going to ethnically cleanse (genocide) the Palistinians!

Head Heeb writes

"If the word "Zionism" has been defined to its extreme, then the term "genocide," in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, has undergone exactly the opposite metamorphosis. The definition of genocide is well established in international law. Article 6 of the Rome Statute defines it as follows:

... any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

The key phrase is the one defining the mens rea - that, in order to constitute genocide, an act must be undertaken "with intent to destroy" a national, ethnic, racial or religious group. There is a notable lack of intent among Israelis to destroy the Palestinian ethnic/national group as such. Even the far-right Herut does not advocate the physical or cultural destruction of the Palestinians. Instead, Herut advocates mass deportation, which is arguably a crime against humanity but is not genocide. And the mainstream of Israeli politics, which rejects transfer and recognizes the inevitability of a Palestinian state, is devoid of any desire to destroy the Palestinian people.

The term "genocide" was never intended to encompass killings in battle or anti-terrorist curfews. It is possible to question the legality of such things, but calling them "genocide" is an unconscionable trivialization of the term. It is an insult to the 800,000 Tutsi killed in Rwanda, or the millions who now face starvation in Matabeleland as a result of the Zimbabwe government's food distribution policies."


sorry..posted this to the wrong entry.


you know, that outfit reminds me of winnie mandela - they look similar no? Oh ho ho...



Let us set the record straight here. First point that should be mentioned is that the current occupants of Israel have no lineal claim the the Israelite nation of the Torah. They are of Khazarian ansestry, which is well documented. They converted to "Judaism" in the 8th century. They have no legitimate claim to Israel. They were placed there in by the US and Great Britain after WW2. The uncivilised African as you characterize "Beta Israel" were practicing the original true Hebrew doctrine long before the Khazarian conversion. The Khazars are the children of Japeth and as a consequence are not even "Semetic" much less Israelite. To be fair though I beleive the majority of people living in Israel beleive they are true Israelite descendants, the conversion being that powerful. However the truth always comes to light. The true descedants of the Israelites in these days if the Torah is to be taken seriously, Have no idea who they are, and only now are waking up to the startling truth. The "placement" of the Khazars in the promised land is not the fullfilment of the prophesy of the return of the Israelite people to the promised land, but a hoax. There are 13 tribes of Israelites, and I have yet to hear anyone in Israel claim any tribe but Judah. They have a lot more people to admit, and some to expel. They did not do anyone any favors by accepting "beta israel" into a land that they belong. If Beta Israel is authentic then this is just the beginning.


What the hell is he on about?


"They are of Khazarian ansestry, which is well documented. They converted to "Judaism" in the 8th century. They have no legitimate claim to Israel. They were placed there in by the US and Great Britain after WW2."
Well documented??? "judaism" "placed there" - what are you talking about?
I suggest you read some basic history before you come forward with these childlike comments. Or alternatively take prescribed psychiatric medications.

Dr. Asseo

Abu Sharmuta Bin Sharmuta

FWIW, I think the word "khazar" is hebrew or yiddish for "pig" (Arabic too?)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search this Blog

Contact Us

  • Email_1

Events & Lectures

  • Advertise your event or lecture here

News Feed

Comments Disclaimer

  • Comments on this site are the views and opinions of the persons who write the comments and do not reflect the views of the authors of this blog. Comments are often left unmoderated. Should you feel that you have been personally slandered in the comments, please let us know and we will remove the offensive comment.