JPOST: What South African Jews think of Goldstone

Here's an article from the Jerusalem Post on the views of South African Jewish communal leaders regarding Goldstone's Gaza report: What South African Jews think of Richard Goldstone (thanks Shaun).

"He sold us out," said an angry Ze'ev Krengel, the usually soft-spoken, liberal, Zionist chairman of the South African Board of Governors. "The damage has been done. He proved that terrorism works, that if you fight from within your own civilians you can win." [...] Krengel and the others, who preferred to remain anonymous, say they are "very, very angry" at Goldstone. "In the end, the biggest loser will be Richard Goldstone, who will go down in history as the person who judged Israel unfairly," said Krengel. "He had the power to right the wrongs [of the anti-Israeli Human Rights Council], but he didn't. He did the opposite."

Comments

[Shaun]

Chief Rabbi Goldstein wrote an op-ed to the Jpost that completely dismantles the Goldstone report, appropriately titled: It looks like law, but it's just politics
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1255450652253&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Any more feedback from the Shministim encounter?

[Dsinc]

Posted by Robert Spencer at JihadWatch

Ah, that explains it: OIC initiated the Goldstone Report

The egregiously pro-jihad and anti-Israel Goldstone Report turns out to have been initiated by the Organization of the Islamic Conference -- which explains why it was egregiously pro-jihad and anti-Israel. The OIC, don't forget, is the chief foe of the freedom of speech around the world today, and is making a concerted effort to criminalize any honest discussion of the Islamic motives and goals of the Islamic jihadists. The winners, if they succeed, would only be those same jihadists. As with the Goldstone Report. "'OIC initiated Goldstone inquiry,'" from Al-Jazeera, October 28 (thanks to David Littman):

No wonder the report is biased. Goldstone was working for Israel's enemies.